NewValidDumpsは同業の中でそんなに良い地位を取るの原因は弊社のかなり正確な試験の練習問題と解答そえに迅速の更新で、このようにとても良い成績がとられています。そして、弊社が提供した問題集を安心で使用して、試験を安心で受けて、君のSOA S90.09復習テキスト認証試験の１００％の合格率を保証しますす。NewValidDumpsにたくさんのIT専門人士がいって、弊社の問題集に社会のITエリートが認定されて、弊社の問題集は試験の大幅カーバして、合格率が１００％にまで達します。 競争がますます激しいIT業種では、SOAのS90.09復習テキスト試験の認定は欠くことができない認証です。NewValidDumpsを選んだら、君が一回でSOAのS90.09復習テキスト認定試験に合格するのを保証します。 SOAのS90.09復習テキスト試験に合格することは容易なことではなくて、良い訓練ツールは成功の保証でNewValidDumpsは君の試験の問題を準備してしまいました。

SOA Certification S90.09 やってみて第一歩を進める勇気があります。

SOA Certification S90.09復習テキスト - SOA Design & Architecture Lab どんな業界で自分に良い昇進機会があると希望する職人がとても多いと思って、IT業界にも例外ではありません。 我々のSOAのS90.09 シュミレーション問題集ソフトはあなたのすべての需要を満たすのを希望します。問題集の全面性と権威性、SOAのS90.09 シュミレーション問題集ソフトがPDF版、オンライン版とソフト版があるという資料のバーションの多様性、購入の前にデモの無料ダウンロード、購入の後でSOAのS90.09 シュミレーション問題集ソフトの一年間の無料更新、これ全部は我々の誠の心を示しています。

NewValidDumpsの専門家チームが君の需要を満たすために自分の経験と知識を利用してSOAのS90.09復習テキスト認定試験対策模擬テスト問題集が研究しました。模擬テスト問題集と真実の試験問題がよく似ています。一目でわかる最新の出題傾向でわかりやすい解説と充実の補充問題があります。

SOA S90.09復習テキスト - 近年、IT領域で競争がますます激しくなります。

SOA　S90.09復習テキスト資格認定はIT技術領域に従事する人に必要があります。我々社のSOA　S90.09復習テキスト試験練習問題はあなたに試験うま合格できるのを支援します。あなたの取得したSOA　S90.09復習テキスト資格認定は、仕事中に核心技術知識を同僚に認可されるし、あなたの技術信頼度を増強できます。

NewValidDumpsのSOAのS90.09復習テキスト試験トレーニング資料は豊富な知識と経験を持っているIT専門家に研究された成果で、正確度がとても高いです。NewValidDumpsに会ったら、最高のトレーニング資料を見つけました。

S90.09 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
When Service A receives a message from Service Consumer A(1),the message is processed by Component A.
This component first invokes Component B (2), which uses values from the message to query
Database A in order to retrieve additional data.
Component B then returns the additional data to Component A.
Component A then invokes Component C (3), which interacts with the API of a legacy system to retrieve a new data value. Component C then returns the data value back to
Component A.
Next, Component A sends some of the data it has accumulated to Component D (4), which writes the data to a text file that is placed in a specific folder. Component D then waits until this file is imported into a different system via a regularly scheduled batch import. Upon completion of the import, Component D returns a success or failure code back to
Component A.
Component A finally sends a response to Service Consumer A (5) containing all of the data collected so far and Service Consumer A writes all of the data to Database B (6).
Components A, B, C.
and D belong to the Service A service architecture. Database A, the legacy system, and the file folders are shared resources within the IT enterprise.
Service A is a task service that completes an entire business task on its own without having to compose other services. However, you have received many complaints about the reliability of Service A . Specifically, it has three problems. First, when Component B accesses Database A, it may not receive a response for several minutes when the database is being accessed by other applications in the IT enterprise. Secondly, the legacy system accessed by Component C frequently crashes and therefore becomes unavailable for extended periods of time. Third, for Component D to respond to Component A, it must first wait for the batch import of the files to occur. This can take several minutes during which Service Consumer A remains stateful and consumes excessive memory. What steps can be taken to address these three problems?
A. The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that Component B is separated to wrap the shared database, thereby allowing Component A to interact with this new service instead of directly interacting with the database. The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied again so that Component C is separated into a separate service that acts as a wrapper of the legacy system API. Component D can then be separated into a separate service and the Event-Driven Messaging pattern can be applied to establish a publisher- subscriber relationship between this new service and Component A and between Service A and Service Consumer A.
The interaction between Service Consumer A and Component A is then redesigned so that
Component A issues a message back to Service Consumer A
when the event related to the batch import is triggered.
B. The Service Data Replication pattern can be applied so that Component B can access a replicated database instead of having to access the shared Database A directly. The
Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that Component C is separated into a separate service that acts as a wrapper of the legacy system API. Next, the Asynchronous Queuing pattern can be applied so that a messaging queue is positioned between Component A and the new wrapper service, thereby enabling communication during times when the legacy system is unavailable. Finally, Component D is separated into a new service and the
Event-Driven Messaging pattern is applied to establish a publisher-subscriber relationship between this service and Component A and between Service A and Service Consumer A.
The interaction logic is redesigned as follows: Component A interacts with Component B, the new wrapper service, and then issues a request to the new event-driven service. Upon receiving a response triggered by the event related to the batch import, Service A responds to Service Consumer A.
C. The Service Data Replication pattern can be applied so that Component B can access a replicated database instead of having to access the shared Database A directly. The
Legacy Wrapper pattern can be applied so that Component C is separated into a separate service that acts as a wrapper of the legacy system API. Next, the Reliable Messaging pattern can be applied so that acknowledgements are issued from the new wrapper service to Component A, thereby enabling notifying Component A during times when the legacy system is unavailable. Finally, Component D is separated into a separate service and the
Event-Driven Messaging pattern is applied to establish a publisher-subscriber relationship between this new service and Component A.
The interaction between Service Consumer A and Component A is then redesigned so that
Component A first interacts with Component
B and the new wrapper service. Service A then issues a final message back to Service
Consumer A.
D. None of the above.
Answer: B

QUESTION NO: 2
You are told that in this service composition architecture, all four services are exchanging invoice-related data in an XML format. The services in Service Inventory A are standardized to use a specific XML schema for invoice data. Design standards were not applied to the service contracts used in Service Inventory B, which means that each service uses a different XML schema for the same kind of data. Database A and Database
B can only accept data in the Comma Separated Value (CSV) format and therefore cannot accept XML formatted data. What steps can be taken to enable the planned data exchange between these four services?
A. The Data Model Transformation pattern can be applied so that data model transformation logic is positioned between Service A and Service C and between Service C and Service D . The Data Format Transformation pattern can be applied so that data format transformation logic is positioned between the Service B logic and Database A and between the Service D logic and Database B.
B. The Data Model Transformation pattern can be applied so that data model transformation logic is positioned between Service A and Service C . The Protocol Bridging pattern can be applied so that protocol bridging logic is positioned between Service A and
Service B and between the Service C and Service D . The Data Format Transformation pattern can be applied so that data format transformation logic is positioned between the
Service B logic and Database A and between the Service D logic and Database B.
C. None of the above.
D. The Data Model Transformation pattern can be applied so that data model transformation logic is positioned between Service A and Service B, between Service A and Service C, and between Service C and Service D . The Data Format Transformation pattern can be applied so that data format transformation logic is positioned between the
Service B logic and Database A and between the Service D logic and Database B.
Answer: D

QUESTION NO: 3
It has been confirmed that Policy A and Policy B are, in fact, the same policy and that the security credential check performed by Service Agent B also needs to be carried out on messages sent to Service B .
How can this service composition architecture be changed to reduce the redundancy of policy content and fulfill the new security requirement?
A. The Policy Centralization pattern can be applied so that Policy A and Policy B are combined into the same policy. The policy enforcement logic is removed from Service
Agent C and Service Agent A is then used to enforce the policy for messages sent to
Service A and Service B . Service Agent B can be used to perform the security credential check for Service A and Service B .
B. None of the above.
C. The Policy Centralization pattern can be applied so that Service Agent A is changed to enforce the policy for messages sent to Service A and Service B and to perform the security credential check for Service A and Service B .
D. The Policy Centralization pattern can be applied so that Policy A and Policy B are combined into the same policy. The Service Agent pattern is then applied to introduce a new service agent (called Service Agent D) which carries out the validation and enforcement of Policy A and Policy B.
Service Agent B can be moved so that it performs
the security credential check for Service B, but not for Service A .
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 4
Service A is a task service that is required to carry out a series of updates to a set of databases in order to complete a task. To perform the database updates Service A must interact with three other services, each of which provides standardized data access capabilities.
Service A sends its first update request message to Service B (1), which then responds with a message containing a success or failure code (2). Service A then sends its second update request message to Service C (3), which also responds with a message containing a success or failure code (4). Finally, Service A sends a request message to Service D (5), which responds with its own message containing a success or failure code (6).
You've been asked to change this service composition architecture in order to fulfill a set of new requirements: First, if the database update performed by Service B fails, then it must be logged by Service A.
Secondly, if the database update performed by Service C fails,
then a notification e-mail must be sent out to a human administrator. Third, if the database update performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both of these updates must be reversed so that the respective databases are restored back to their original states.
What steps can be taken to fulfill these requirements?
A. The Compensating Service Transaction pattern is applied to Service B so that it invokes exception handling logic that logs failed database updates before responding with a failure code back to Service A . Similarly, the Compensating Service Transaction pattern is applied to Service C so that it issues an e-mail notification to a human administrator when a database update fails. The Atomic Service Transaction pattern is applied so that Services
A, C, and D are encompassed in the scope of a transaction that will guarantee that if the database updates performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both updates will be rolled back. The Service Autonomy principle is further applied to Service A to ensure that it remains consistently available to carry out this sequence of actions.
B. None of the above.
C. The Atomic Service Transaction pattern is applied so that Services A, C, and D are encompassed in the scope of a transaction that will guarantee that if the database updates performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both updates will be rolled back. The
Compensating Service Transaction pattern is then applied to all services so that the scope of the compensating transaction includes the scope of the atomic transaction. The compensating exception logic that is added to Service D automatically invokes Service B to log the failure condition and Service C to issue the e-mail notification to the human administrator. This way, it is guaranteed that the compensating logic is always executed together with the atomic transaction logic.
D. Service A is updated to perform a logging routine when Service A receives a response message from Service B containing a failure code. Service A is further updated to send an e-mail notification to a human administrator if Service A receives a response message from
Service C containing a failure code. The Atomic Service Transaction pattern is applied so that Services A, C, and D are encompassed in the scope of a transaction that will guarantee that if the database updates performed by either Service C or Service D fails, then both updates will be rolled back.
Answer: D

NetSuite NetSuite-Financial-User認定試験の問題集は大勢の人の注目を集め、とても人気がある商品です。 Huawei H40-121 - NewValidDumpsはIT認定試験を受験した多くの人々を助けました。 Cisco 300-430試験に合格するには、関連する教材を探す必要があります。 いまOracle 1z1-071試験に合格するショートカットを教えてあげますから。 もしあなたはまだ合格のためにSOA Salesforce CRT-101-JPNに大量の貴重な時間とエネルギーをかかって一生懸命準備し、SOA Salesforce CRT-101-JPN「SOA Design & Architecture Lab」認証試験に合格するの近道が分からなくって、今はNewValidDumpsが有効なSOA Salesforce CRT-101-JPN認定試験の合格の方法を提供して、君は半分の労力で倍の成果を取るの与えています。

Updated: May 25, 2022