DP-201参考書 資格取得

大方の人は成功への近道がないとよく言われますけど、IT人材にとって、私達のDP-201参考書問題集はあなたの成功へショートカットです。NewValidDumpsのDP-201参考書問題集を通して、他の人が手に入れない資格認証を簡単に受け取ります。早めによりよい仕事を探しできて、長閑な万元以上の月給がある生活を楽しみます。 DP-201参考書認定試験に合格することは難しいようですね。試験を申し込みたいあなたは、いまどうやって試験に準備すべきなのかで悩んでいますか。 どのようにすばらしい人になれますか?ここで、あなたに我々のMicrosoft DP-201参考書試験問題集をお勧めください。

Azure Data Engineer Associate DP-201 NewValidDumpsは君にとってベストな選択になります。

弊社のMicrosoft DP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution参考書問題集を使用した後、DP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution参考書試験に合格するのはあまりに難しくないことだと知られます。 うちのMicrosoftのDP-201 問題集無料試験トレーニング資料を購入する前に、NewValidDumpsのサイトで、一部分のフリーな試験問題と解答をダンロードでき、試用してみます。君がうちの学習教材を購入した後、私たちは一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができます。

努力すれば報われますなので、Microsoft DP-201参考書資格認定を取得して自分の生活状況を改善できます。IT職員のあなたは毎月毎月のあまり少ない給料を持っていますが、暇の時間でひたすら楽しむんでいいですか。Microsoft DP-201参考書試験認定書はIT職員野給料増加と仕事の昇進にとって、大切なものです。

Microsoft DP-201参考書 - 心はもはや空しくなく、生活を美しくなります。

今の多士済々な社会の中で、IT専門人士はとても人気がありますが、競争も大きいです。だからいろいろな方は試験を借って、自分の社会の地位を固めたいです。DP-201参考書認定試験はMicrosoftの中に重要な認証試験の一つですが、NewValidDumpsにIT業界のエリートのグループがあって、彼達は自分の経験と専門知識を使ってMicrosoft DP-201参考書「Designing an Azure Data Solution」認証試験に参加する方に対して問題集を研究続けています。

現在IT技術会社に通勤しているあなたは、MicrosoftのDP-201参考書試験認定を取得しましたか?DP-201参考書試験認定は給料の増加とジョブのプロモーションに役立ちます。短時間でDP-201参考書試験に一発合格したいなら、我々社のMicrosoftのDP-201参考書資料を参考しましょう。

DP-201 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You are planning a design pattern based on the Lambda architecture as shown in the exhibit.
Which Azure services should you use f2 or the cold path? To answer, drag the appropriate services to the correct layers. Each service may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
Layer 2: Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
Layer 3: Azure SQL Data Warehouse
Azure SQL Data Warehouse can be used for batch processing.
Note: Lambda architectures use batch-processing, stream-processing, and a serving layer to minimize the latency involved in querying big data.
References:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/lambda-architecture-using-azure-cosmosdb-faster- performance-low-tco-l
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch- processing

QUESTION NO: 2
You have a Windows-based solution that analyzes scientific data. You are designing a cloud- based solution that performs real-time analysis of the data.
You need to design the logical flow for the solution.
Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A. Send data from the application to Azure Data Lake Storage.
B. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from an Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Azure Data Lake Storage.
C. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job on an edge device. Ingress data from an Azure Data Factory instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
D. Send data from the application to an Azure Stream Analytics job.
E. Send data from the application to an Azure Event Hub instance.
F. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from the Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
Answer: E,F
Explanation
Stream Analytics has first-class integration with Azure data streams as inputs from three kinds of resources:
Azure Event Hubs
Azure IoT Hub
Azure Blob storage
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/stream-analytics/stream-analytics-define-inputs

QUESTION NO: 3
Which consistency level should you use for Health Interface?
A. Strong
B. Bounded Staleness
C. Session
D. Consistent Prefix
Answer: A
Explanation
Scenario: ADatum identifies the following requirements for the Health Interface application:
reads must display be the most recent committed version of an item.
Azure Cosmos DB consistency levels include:
Strong: Strong consistency offers a linearizability guarantee. Linearizability refers to serving requests concurrently. The reads are guaranteed to return the most recent committed version of an item. A client never sees an uncommitted or partial write. Users are always guaranteed to read the latest committed write.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/consistency-levels

QUESTION NO: 4
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an HDInsight/Hadoop cluster solution that uses Azure Data Lake Gen1 Storage.
The solution requires POSIX permissions and enables diagnostics logging for auditing.
You need to recommend solutions that optimize storage.
Proposed Solution: Implement compaction jobs to combine small files into larger files.
Does the solution meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: A
Explanation
Depending on what services and workloads are using the data, a good size to consider for files is 256
MB or greater. If the file sizes cannot be batched when landing in Data Lake Storage Gen1, you can have a separate compaction job that combines these files into larger ones.
Note: POSIX permissions and auditing in Data Lake Storage Gen1 comes with an overhead that becomes apparent when working with numerous small files. As a best practice, you must batch your data into larger files versus writing thousands or millions of small files to Data Lake Storage Gen1.
Avoiding small file sizes can have multiple benefits, such as:
Lowering the authentication checks across multiple files
Reduced open file connections
Faster copying/replication
Fewer files to process when updating Data Lake Storage Gen1 POSIX permissions References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-lake-store/data-lake-store-best-practices

QUESTION NO: 5
You are designing a solution that will use Azure Table storage. The solution will log records in the following entity.
You are evaluating which partition key to use based on the following two scenarios:
* Scenario1: Minimize hotspots under heavy write workloads.
* Scenario2: Ensure that date lookups are as efficient as possible for read workloads.
Which partition key should you use for each scenario? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/designing-a-scalable-partitioning- strategy-for-azure-tab

WGU Introduction-to-IT - 受験者がNewValidDumpsを選択したら高度専門の試験に100%合格することが問題にならないと保証いたします。 人によって目標が違いますが、あなたにMicrosoft SAP C_C4H630_34試験に順調に合格できるのは我々の共同の目標です。 NewValidDumpsはMicrosoftのThe Open Group OGEA-103認定試験に便利なサービスを提供するサイトで、従来の試験によってNewValidDumps が今年のMicrosoftのThe Open Group OGEA-103認定試験を予測してもっとも真実に近い問題集を研究し続けます。 あなたに高品質で、全面的なUiPath UiPath-ADAv1-JPN参考資料を提供することは私たちの責任です。 MicrosoftのGoogle Associate-Cloud-Engineer認定試験に準備する練習ツールや訓練機関に通学しなればまりませんでしょう。

Updated: May 28, 2022

DP-201参考書 & Microsoft Designing An Azure Data Solution資格準備

PDF問題と解答

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-03
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 試験情報

  ダウンロード


 

模擬試験

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-03
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 テスト模擬問題集

  ダウンロード


 

オンライン版

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-03
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 受験料

  ダウンロード


 

DP-201 試験概要

DP-201 予想試験 関連認定