それは問題ではないですよ。NewValidDumpsあなたを時間を節約させことができますから。NewValidDumpsのさまざまなIT試験の問題集はあなたを受験したい任意の試験に合格させることができます。 NewValidDumpsは実際の環境で本格的なMicrosoftの70-461トレーニング費用「Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014」の試験の準備過程を提供しています。もしあなたは初心者若しくは専門的な技能を高めたかったら、NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461トレーニング費用「Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014」の試験問題があなたが一歩一歩自分の念願に近くために助けを差し上げます。 ですから、はやくNewValidDumpsの70-461トレーニング費用問題集を入手しましょう。

MCSA 70-461 でも、成功へのショートカットがを見つけました。

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461 - Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014トレーニング費用試験トレーニング資料はIT認証試験を受ける全ての受験生が試験に合格することを助けるもので、受験生からの良い評価をたくさんもらいました。 IT業種で仕事しているあなたは、夢を達成するためにどんな方法を利用するつもりですか。実際には、IT認定試験を受験して認証資格を取るのは一つの良い方法です。

この目標を達成するのは、あなたにとってIT分野での第一歩だけですが、我々のMicrosoftの70-461トレーニング費用ソフトを開発するすべての意義です。だから、我々は尽力して我々の問題集を多くしてNewValidDumpsの専門かたちに研究させてあなたの合格する可能性を増大します。あなたの利用するMicrosoftの70-461トレーニング費用ソフトが最新版のを保証するために、一年間の無料更新を提供します。

Microsoft 70-461トレーニング費用 - 心配なく我々の真題を利用してください。

弊社のNewValidDumpsはIT認定試験のソフトの一番信頼たるバンドになるという目標を達成するために、弊社はあなたに最新版のMicrosoftの70-461トレーニング費用試験問題集を提供いたします。弊社のソフトを使用して、ほとんどのお客様は難しいと思われているMicrosoftの70-461トレーニング費用試験に順調に剛角しました。これも弊社が自信的にあなたに商品を薦める原因です。もし弊社のソフトを使ってあなたは残念で試験に失敗したら、弊社は全額で返金することを保証いたします。すべてのことの目的はあなたに安心に試験に準備さされるということです。

NewValidDumps70-461トレーニング費用問題集は試験の範囲を広くカバーするだけでなく、質は高いです。NewValidDumpsの70-461トレーニング費用問題集を購入し勉強するだけ、あなたは試験にたやすく合格できます。

70-461 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You have an XML schema collection named Sales.InvoiceSchema.
You need to declare a variable of the XML type named invoice. The solution must ensure that the invoice is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema.
The solution must ensure that the invoice variable is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema schema.
Provide the correct code in the answer area.
Answer:
DECLARE @invoice XML(Sales.InvoiceSchema)

QUESTION NO: 2
You have a database that contains the tables shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to create a view named uv_CustomerFullName to meet the following requirements:
* The code must NOT include object delimiters.
* The view must be created in the Sales schema.
* Columns must only be referenced by using one-part names.
* The view must return the first name and the last name of all customers.
* The view must prevent the underlying structure of the customer table from being changed.
* The view must be able to resolve all referenced objects, regardless of the user's default schema.
Which code segment should you use?
To answer, type the correct code in the answer area.
A. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
B. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM Sales.Customers
Answer: B
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187956.aspx

QUESTION NO: 3
You are the administrator for a heavily-used OLTP Microsoft SQL Server database.
You are troubleshooting performance issues seen when using stored procedures in the database. The database stores millions of orders across thousands of customers. Some of the customers have large numbers of orders, while others have only one order. You update the statistics and perform defragmentation of all tables and indexes, but two stored procedures still have issues when accessing data.
p_GetCustomer accepts @companyID as a parameter. From the results of profiling, you know that 90 percent of the calls use the @companyid value of 5, while the other 10 percent of calls are evenly distributed across another 10000 values. While viewing the execution plan, you discover that a non- clustered index seek is used.
p_GetShipDate accepts @orderID as a parameter and returns the ship date for that order. You discover that the execution plan is performing a scan on a non-clustered index that has orderID as the index key.
You need to add appropriate query hints to each stored procedure to improve the performance.
What should you do? To answer, drag the appropriate procedures to the correct hints. Each procedure may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
Answer:
Explanation:
Box 1: Optimize FOR..
OPTIMIZE FOR ( @variable_name { UNKNOWN | = literal_constant } [ , ...n ] ) Instructs the query optimizer to use a particular value for a local variable when the query is compiled and optimized. The value is used only during query optimization, and not during query execution.
Box 2: FORCESEEK
FORCESEEK [ (index_value(index_column_name [ ,... n ] )) ]
Specifies that the query optimizer use only an index seek operation as the access path to the data in the table or view.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-query?view=sql-server-2017
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-table?view=sql-server-2017

QUESTION NO: 4
You administer a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database named ContosoDb. Tables are defined as shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to display rows from the Orders table for the Customers row having the CustomerId value set to 1 in the following XML format:
<row OrderId="1" OrderDate="2000-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="3400.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" />
<row OrderId="2" OrderDate="2001-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="4300.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" /> Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW
B. SELECT Name AS 'Customers/Name', Country AS 'Customers/Country', OrderId, OrderDate,
Amount FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId
WHERE Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
C. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId - Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
D. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
E. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
F. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
G. SELECT Name AS '@Name', Country AS '@Country', OrderId, OrderDate, Amount FROM Orders
INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
H. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW, ELEMENTS
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 5
Your database contains a table named Purchases. The table includes a DATETIME column named PurchaseTime that stores the date and time each purchase is made. There is a non-clustered index on the PurchaseTime column.
The business team wants a report that displays the total number of purchases made on the current day.
You need to write a query that will return the correct results in the most efficient manner.
Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = GETDATE()
B. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime >= CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
AND PurchaseTime < DATEADD(DAY, 1, CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE()))
C. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE CONVERT(VARCHAR, PurchaseTime, 112) = CONVERT(VARCHAR, GETDATE(), 112)
D. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
Answer: B
Explanation:
Two answers will return the correct results (the "WHERE CONVERT..." and "WHERE ... AND ... " answers).
The correct answer for Microsoft would be the answer that is most "efficient". Anybody have a clue as to which is most efficient? In the execution plan, the one that I've selected as the correct answer is the query with the shortest duration. Also, the query answer with "WHERE CONVERT..." threw warnings in the execution plan...something about affecting CardinalityEstimate and SeekPlan.
I also found this article, which leads me to believe that I have the correct answer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181034.aspx

PMI PMP-JPN - これをよくできるために、我々は全日24時間のサービスを提供します。 弊社のMicrosoft　ISC CISSP-ISSEP-JPN問題集を通して復習してから、真実的に自分の能力の向上を感じ、ISC CISSP-ISSEP-JPN資格認定を受け取ります。 我々の提供するPDF版のMicrosoftのSAP C_SIGPM_2403試験の資料はあなたにいつでもどこでも読めさせます。 Cisco 100-490問題集は全面的かつわかりやすいです。 我々NewValidDumpsはMicrosoftのSalesforce CRT-403J試験問題集をリリースする以降、多くのお客様の好評を博したのは弊社にとって、大変な名誉なことです。

Updated: May 28, 2022