試験の目標が変わる限り、あるいは我々の勉強資料が変わる限り、すぐに更新して差し上げます。あなたのニーズをよく知っていていますから、あなたに試験に合格する自信を与えます。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集試験トレーニング資料を手に入れたら、我々は一年間の無料更新サービスを提供します。 PDFのバージョンとソフトウェアのバージョンがありますから、ソフトウェアのバージョンを必要としたら、弊社のカスタマーサービススタッフから取得してください。弊社のMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集勉強資料を利用したら、きっと試験を受けるための時間とお金を節約できます。 人生にはあまりにも多くの変化および未知の誘惑がありますから、まだ若いときに自分自身のために強固な基盤を築くべきです。

MCTS 070-461 そうすると、我々の信頼性をテストできます。

NewValidDumpsのITエリートたちは彼らの専門的な目で、最新的なMicrosoftの070-461 - Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014テスト模擬問題集試験トレーニング資料に注目していて、うちのMicrosoftの070-461 - Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014テスト模擬問題集問題集の高い正確性を保証するのです。 このトレーニング資料を持っていたら、試験のために充分の準備をすることができます。そうしたら、試験に受かる信心も持つようになります。

Microsoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集認定試験に合格することはきっと君の職業生涯の輝い将来に大変役に立ちます。NewValidDumpsを選ぶなら、君がMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集認定試験に合格するということできっと喜んでいます。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集問題集を購入するなら、君がMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集認定試験に合格する率は１００パーセントです。

Microsoft 070-461テスト模擬問題集 - 早くNewValidDumpsの問題集を君の手に入れましょう。

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集試験トレーニング資料を使ったら、君のMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集認定試験に合格するという夢が叶えます。なぜなら、それはMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集認定試験に関する必要なものを含まれるからです。NewValidDumpsを選んだら、あなたは簡単に認定試験に合格することができますし、あなたはITエリートたちの一人になることもできます。まだ何を待っていますか。早速買いに行きましょう。

もし弊社の商品が君にとっては何も役割にならなくて全額で返金いたいます。多くのIT者がMicrosoftの070-461テスト模擬問題集認定試験を通してIT業界の中で良い就職機会を得たくて、生活水準も向上させたいです。

070-461 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You have an XML schema collection named Sales.InvoiceSchema.
You need to declare a variable of the XML type named invoice. The solution must ensure that the invoice is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema.
The solution must ensure that the invoice variable is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema schema.
Provide the correct code in the answer area.
Answer:
DECLARE @invoice XML(Sales.InvoiceSchema)

QUESTION NO: 2
You are the administrator for a heavily-used OLTP Microsoft SQL Server database.
You are troubleshooting performance issues seen when using stored procedures in the database. The database stores millions of orders across thousands of customers. Some of the customers have large numbers of orders, while others have only one order. You update the statistics and perform defragmentation of all tables and indexes, but two stored procedures still have issues when accessing data.
p_GetCustomer accepts @companyID as a parameter. From the results of profiling, you know that 90 percent of the calls use the @companyid value of 5, while the other 10 percent of calls are evenly distributed across another 10000 values. While viewing the execution plan, you discover that a non- clustered index seek is used.
p_GetShipDate accepts @orderID as a parameter and returns the ship date for that order. You discover that the execution plan is performing a scan on a non-clustered index that has orderID as the index key.
You need to add appropriate query hints to each stored procedure to improve the performance.
What should you do? To answer, drag the appropriate procedures to the correct hints. Each procedure may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
Answer:
Explanation:
Box 1: Optimize FOR..
OPTIMIZE FOR ( @variable_name { UNKNOWN | = literal_constant } [ , ...n ] ) Instructs the query optimizer to use a particular value for a local variable when the query is compiled and optimized. The value is used only during query optimization, and not during query execution.
Box 2: FORCESEEK
FORCESEEK [ (index_value(index_column_name [ ,... n ] )) ]
Specifies that the query optimizer use only an index seek operation as the access path to the data in the table or view.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-query?view=sql-server-2017
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-table?view=sql-server-2017

QUESTION NO: 3
You administer a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database named ContosoDb. Tables are defined as shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to display rows from the Orders table for the Customers row having the CustomerId value set to 1 in the following XML format:
<row OrderId="1" OrderDate="2000-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="3400.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" />
<row OrderId="2" OrderDate="2001-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="4300.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" /> Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW
B. SELECT Name AS 'Customers/Name', Country AS 'Customers/Country', OrderId, OrderDate,
Amount FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId
WHERE Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
C. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId - Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
D. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
E. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
F. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
G. SELECT Name AS '@Name', Country AS '@Country', OrderId, OrderDate, Amount FROM Orders
INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
H. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW, ELEMENTS
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 4
You have a database that contains the tables shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to create a view named uv_CustomerFullName to meet the following requirements:
* The code must NOT include object delimiters.
* The view must be created in the Sales schema.
* Columns must only be referenced by using one-part names.
* The view must return the first name and the last name of all customers.
* The view must prevent the underlying structure of the customer table from being changed.
* The view must be able to resolve all referenced objects, regardless of the user's default schema.
Which code segment should you use?
To answer, type the correct code in the answer area.
A. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
B. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM Sales.Customers
Answer: B
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187956.aspx

QUESTION NO: 5
Your database contains a table named Purchases. The table includes a DATETIME column named PurchaseTime that stores the date and time each purchase is made. There is a non-clustered index on the PurchaseTime column.
The business team wants a report that displays the total number of purchases made on the current day.
You need to write a query that will return the correct results in the most efficient manner.
Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = GETDATE()
B. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime >= CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
AND PurchaseTime < DATEADD(DAY, 1, CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE()))
C. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE CONVERT(VARCHAR, PurchaseTime, 112) = CONVERT(VARCHAR, GETDATE(), 112)
D. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
Answer: B
Explanation:
Two answers will return the correct results (the "WHERE CONVERT..." and "WHERE ... AND ... " answers).
The correct answer for Microsoft would be the answer that is most "efficient". Anybody have a clue as to which is most efficient? In the execution plan, the one that I've selected as the correct answer is the query with the shortest duration. Also, the query answer with "WHERE CONVERT..." threw warnings in the execution plan...something about affecting CardinalityEstimate and SeekPlan.
I also found this article, which leads me to believe that I have the correct answer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181034.aspx

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのTableau TDA-C01-JPN試験トレーニング資料はMicrosoftのTableau TDA-C01-JPN認定試験を準備するのリーダーです。 Salesforce JavaScript-Developer-I-JPN - NewValidDumpsは認証試験の専門的なリーダーで、最全面的な認証基準のトレーニング方法を追求して、１００パーセントの成功率を保証します。 無料デモはあなたに安心で購入して、購入した後1年間の無料MicrosoftのMicrosoft MB-260試験の更新はあなたに安心で試験を準備することができます、あなたは確実に購入を休ませることができます私たちのソフトウェアを試してみてください。 Salesforce Tableau-CRM-Einstein-Discovery-Consultant - 、弊社は最全面的な認証試験問題と解答を提供するだけでまく、一年間の無料更新サービスも提供いたします。 NetSuite NetSuite-Administrator - 我々の承諾だけでなく、お客様に最も全面的で最高のサービスを提供します。

Updated: May 28, 2022