DP-201試験関連赤本 資格取得

努力すれば報われますなので、Microsoft DP-201試験関連赤本資格認定を取得して自分の生活状況を改善できます。IT職員のあなたは毎月毎月のあまり少ない給料を持っていますが、暇の時間でひたすら楽しむんでいいですか。Microsoft DP-201試験関連赤本試験認定書はIT職員野給料増加と仕事の昇進にとって、大切なものです。 購入する人々が大変多いですから、あなたもミスしないで速くショッピングカートに入れましょう。MicrosoftのDP-201試験関連赤本認定試験と言ったら、人々は迷っています。 多分、DP-201試験関連赤本テスト質問の数が伝統的な問題の数倍である。

Azure Data Engineer Associate DP-201 NewValidDumpsを選ぶのは成功を選ぶのに等しいです。

NewValidDumpsが提供したMicrosoftのDP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution試験関連赤本トレーニング資料を利用したら、MicrosoftのDP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution試験関連赤本認定試験に受かることはたやすくなります。 購入した前の無料の試み、購入するときのお支払いへの保障、購入した一年間の無料更新MicrosoftのDP-201 関連問題資料試験に失敗した全額での返金…これらは我々のお客様への承諾です。常々、時間とお金ばかり効果がないです。

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201試験関連赤本試験トレーニング資料はインターネットでの全てのトレーニング資料のリーダーです。NewValidDumpsはあなたが首尾よく試験に合格することを助けるだけでなく、あなたの知識と技能を向上させることもできます。あなたが自分のキャリアでの異なる条件で自身の利点を発揮することを助けられます。

その中で、Microsoft DP-201試験関連赤本認定試験は最も重要な一つです。

我々社のチームは顧客のすべてのために、改革政策に伴って最新版の信頼できるMicrosoftのDP-201試験関連赤本をリリースされて喜んでいます。我々社はDP-201試験関連赤本問題集のクオリティーをずっと信じられますから、試験に失敗するとの全額返金を承諾します。また、受験生の皆様は一発的に試験に合格できると信じます。もし運が良くないとき、失敗したら、お金を返してあなたの経済損失を減らします。

まだ何を待っていますか。早速買いに行きましょう。

DP-201 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You are planning a design pattern based on the Lambda architecture as shown in the exhibit.
Which Azure services should you use f2 or the cold path? To answer, drag the appropriate services to the correct layers. Each service may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
Layer 2: Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
Layer 3: Azure SQL Data Warehouse
Azure SQL Data Warehouse can be used for batch processing.
Note: Lambda architectures use batch-processing, stream-processing, and a serving layer to minimize the latency involved in querying big data.
References:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/lambda-architecture-using-azure-cosmosdb-faster- performance-low-tco-l
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch- processing

QUESTION NO: 2
You have a Windows-based solution that analyzes scientific data. You are designing a cloud- based solution that performs real-time analysis of the data.
You need to design the logical flow for the solution.
Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A. Send data from the application to Azure Data Lake Storage.
B. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from an Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Azure Data Lake Storage.
C. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job on an edge device. Ingress data from an Azure Data Factory instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
D. Send data from the application to an Azure Stream Analytics job.
E. Send data from the application to an Azure Event Hub instance.
F. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from the Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
Answer: E,F
Explanation
Stream Analytics has first-class integration with Azure data streams as inputs from three kinds of resources:
Azure Event Hubs
Azure IoT Hub
Azure Blob storage
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/stream-analytics/stream-analytics-define-inputs

QUESTION NO: 3
Which consistency level should you use for Health Interface?
A. Strong
B. Bounded Staleness
C. Session
D. Consistent Prefix
Answer: A
Explanation
Scenario: ADatum identifies the following requirements for the Health Interface application:
reads must display be the most recent committed version of an item.
Azure Cosmos DB consistency levels include:
Strong: Strong consistency offers a linearizability guarantee. Linearizability refers to serving requests concurrently. The reads are guaranteed to return the most recent committed version of an item. A client never sees an uncommitted or partial write. Users are always guaranteed to read the latest committed write.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/consistency-levels

QUESTION NO: 4
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an HDInsight/Hadoop cluster solution that uses Azure Data Lake Gen1 Storage.
The solution requires POSIX permissions and enables diagnostics logging for auditing.
You need to recommend solutions that optimize storage.
Proposed Solution: Implement compaction jobs to combine small files into larger files.
Does the solution meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: A
Explanation
Depending on what services and workloads are using the data, a good size to consider for files is 256
MB or greater. If the file sizes cannot be batched when landing in Data Lake Storage Gen1, you can have a separate compaction job that combines these files into larger ones.
Note: POSIX permissions and auditing in Data Lake Storage Gen1 comes with an overhead that becomes apparent when working with numerous small files. As a best practice, you must batch your data into larger files versus writing thousands or millions of small files to Data Lake Storage Gen1.
Avoiding small file sizes can have multiple benefits, such as:
Lowering the authentication checks across multiple files
Reduced open file connections
Faster copying/replication
Fewer files to process when updating Data Lake Storage Gen1 POSIX permissions References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-lake-store/data-lake-store-best-practices

QUESTION NO: 5
You are designing a solution that will use Azure Table storage. The solution will log records in the following entity.
You are evaluating which partition key to use based on the following two scenarios:
* Scenario1: Minimize hotspots under heavy write workloads.
* Scenario2: Ensure that date lookups are as efficient as possible for read workloads.
Which partition key should you use for each scenario? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/designing-a-scalable-partitioning- strategy-for-azure-tab

次のジョブプロモーション、プロジェクタとチャンスを申し込むとき、Microsoft Juniper JN0-223資格認定はライバルに先立つのを助け、あなたの大業を成し遂げられます。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのASQ CMQ-OE試験トレーニング資料はMicrosoftのASQ CMQ-OE認定試験を準備するのリーダーです。 あなたはSAP C-TS462-2022試験に興味を持たれば、今から行動し、SAP C-TS462-2022練習問題を買いましょう。 もちろん、我々はあなたに一番安心させるのは我々の開発する多くの受験生に合格させるMicrosoftのNutanix NCS-core-JPN試験のソフトウェアです。 先月、Salesforce DEX-403試験に参加しました。

Updated: May 28, 2022

DP-201試験関連赤本 & DP-201シュミレーション問題集 - DP-201試験対応

PDF問題と解答

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-14
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 学習指導

  ダウンロード


 

模擬試験

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-14
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 学習体験談

  ダウンロード


 

オンライン版

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-14
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 実際試験

  ダウンロード


 

DP-201 日本語版試験解答