NewValidDumpsの専門家チームが君の需要を満たすために自分の経験と知識を利用してMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル認定試験対策模擬テスト問題集が研究しました。模擬テスト問題集と真実の試験問題がよく似ています。一目でわかる最新の出題傾向でわかりやすい解説と充実の補充問題があります。 NewValidDumpsが提供した教育資料は真実のテストに非常に近くて、あなたが弊社の短期の特殊訓練問題を通じてすぐにIT専門の知識を身につけられます。弊社は君の試験の１００％合格率を保証いたします。 あなたに向いていることを確かめてから買うのも遅くないですよ。

Azure Data Engineer Associate DP-201 もし失敗したら、全額で返金を保証いたします。

MicrosoftのDP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution日本語版サンプル認定試験に受かるのはあなたの技能を検証することだけでなく、あなたの専門知識を証明できて、上司は無駄にあなたを雇うことはしないことの証明書です。 弊社の資源はずっと改訂され、アップデートされていますから、緊密な相関関係があります。MicrosoftのDP-201 日本語版試験解答の認証試験を準備しているあなたは、自分がトレーニングを選んで、しかも次の問題を受かったほうがいいです。

あなたはキャリアで良い昇進のチャンスを持ちたいのなら、NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル「Designing an Azure Data Solution」試験トレーニング資料を利用してMicrosoftの認証の証明書を取ることは良い方法です。現在、MicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル認定試験に受かりたいIT専門人員がたくさんいます。NewValidDumpsの試験トレーニング資料はMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル認定試験の１００パーセントの合格率を保証します。

それはNewValidDumpsのMicrosoft DP-201日本語版サンプル問題集です。

「私はだめです。」という話を永遠に言わないでください。これは皆さんのためのアドバイスです。難しいMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル認定試験に合格する能力を持たないと思っても、あなたは効率的な骨の折れないトレーニングツールを選んで試験に合格させることができます。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル試験トレーニング資料はとても良いトレーニングツールで、１００パーセントの合格率を保証します。それに、資料の値段は手頃です。NewValidDumpsを利用したらあなたはきっと大いに利益を得ることができます。ですから、「私はだめです。」という話を言わないでください。諦めないのなら、希望が現れています。あなたの希望はNewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル試験トレーニング資料にありますから、速く掴みましょう。

一回だけでMicrosoftのDP-201日本語版サンプル試験に合格したい？NewValidDumpsは君の欲求を満たすために存在するのです。NewValidDumpsは君にとってベストな選択になります。

DP-201 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You are planning a design pattern based on the Lambda architecture as shown in the exhibit.
Which Azure services should you use f2 or the cold path? To answer, drag the appropriate services to the correct layers. Each service may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
Layer 2: Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
Layer 3: Azure SQL Data Warehouse
Azure SQL Data Warehouse can be used for batch processing.
Note: Lambda architectures use batch-processing, stream-processing, and a serving layer to minimize the latency involved in querying big data.
References:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/lambda-architecture-using-azure-cosmosdb-faster- performance-low-tco-l
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch- processing

QUESTION NO: 2
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an HDInsight/Hadoop cluster solution that uses Azure Data Lake Gen1 Storage.
The solution requires POSIX permissions and enables diagnostics logging for auditing.
You need to recommend solutions that optimize storage.
Proposed Solution: Implement compaction jobs to combine small files into larger files.
Does the solution meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: A
Explanation
Depending on what services and workloads are using the data, a good size to consider for files is 256
MB or greater. If the file sizes cannot be batched when landing in Data Lake Storage Gen1, you can have a separate compaction job that combines these files into larger ones.
Note: POSIX permissions and auditing in Data Lake Storage Gen1 comes with an overhead that becomes apparent when working with numerous small files. As a best practice, you must batch your data into larger files versus writing thousands or millions of small files to Data Lake Storage Gen1.
Avoiding small file sizes can have multiple benefits, such as:
Lowering the authentication checks across multiple files
Reduced open file connections
Faster copying/replication
Fewer files to process when updating Data Lake Storage Gen1 POSIX permissions References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-lake-store/data-lake-store-best-practices

QUESTION NO: 3
You have a Windows-based solution that analyzes scientific data. You are designing a cloud- based solution that performs real-time analysis of the data.
You need to design the logical flow for the solution.
Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A. Send data from the application to Azure Data Lake Storage.
B. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from an Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Azure Data Lake Storage.
C. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job on an edge device. Ingress data from an Azure Data Factory instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
D. Send data from the application to an Azure Stream Analytics job.
E. Send data from the application to an Azure Event Hub instance.
F. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from the Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
Answer: E,F
Explanation
Stream Analytics has first-class integration with Azure data streams as inputs from three kinds of resources:
Azure Event Hubs
Azure IoT Hub
Azure Blob storage
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/stream-analytics/stream-analytics-define-inputs

QUESTION NO: 4
Which consistency level should you use for Health Interface?
A. Strong
B. Bounded Staleness
C. Session
D. Consistent Prefix
Answer: A
Explanation
Scenario: ADatum identifies the following requirements for the Health Interface application:
reads must display be the most recent committed version of an item.
Azure Cosmos DB consistency levels include:
Strong: Strong consistency offers a linearizability guarantee. Linearizability refers to serving requests concurrently. The reads are guaranteed to return the most recent committed version of an item. A client never sees an uncommitted or partial write. Users are always guaranteed to read the latest committed write.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/consistency-levels

QUESTION NO: 5
You are designing a solution that will use Azure Table storage. The solution will log records in the following entity.
You are evaluating which partition key to use based on the following two scenarios:
* Scenario1: Minimize hotspots under heavy write workloads.
* Scenario2: Ensure that date lookups are as efficient as possible for read workloads.
Which partition key should you use for each scenario? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/designing-a-scalable-partitioning- strategy-for-azure-tab

SAP C-CPI-2404 - ですから、ぜひNewValidDumpsというチャンスを掴んでください。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのSAP C-TADM-23試験トレーニング資料は試験問題と解答を含まれて、豊富な経験を持っているIT業種の専門家が長年の研究を通じて作成したものです。 ISQI CPSA-FL - この文は人々に知られています。 我々の目的はあなたにMicrosoftのSnowflake COF-C02試験に合格することだけです。 Cisco 300-430 - この問題集がIT業界のエリートに研究し出されたもので、素晴らしい練習資料です。

Updated: May 28, 2022