DP-201受験料過去問 資格取得

うちのMicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問試験トレーニング資料を購入する前に、NewValidDumpsのサイトで、一部分のフリーな試験問題と解答をダンロードでき、試用してみます。君がうちの学習教材を購入した後、私たちは一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができます。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問試験トレーニング資料は試験問題と解答を含まれて、豊富な経験を持っているIT業種の専門家が長年の研究を通じて作成したものです。 試験に準備する時間が十分ではないから、DP-201受験料過去問認定試験を諦めた人がたくさんいます。しかし、優秀な資料を利用すれば、短時間の準備をしても、高得点で試験に合格することができます。 時間とお金の集まりより正しい方法がもっと大切です。

Azure Data Engineer Associate DP-201 では、どんな参考書は選べる価値を持っていますか。

それで、IT人材として毎日自分を充実して、DP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution受験料過去問問題集を学ぶ必要があります。 もしうちの学習教材を購入するなら、NewValidDumpsは一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができます。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201 資格受験料認定試験の合格率は100パーセントになっています。

現在IT技術会社に通勤しているあなたは、MicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問試験認定を取得しましたか?DP-201受験料過去問試験認定は給料の増加とジョブのプロモーションに役立ちます。短時間でDP-201受験料過去問試験に一発合格したいなら、我々社のMicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問資料を参考しましょう。また、DP-201受験料過去問問題集に疑問があると、メールで問い合わせてください。

Microsoft DP-201受験料過去問 - 弊社の商品はあなたの圧力を減少できます。

あなたはDP-201受験料過去問試験に不安を持っていますか?DP-201受験料過去問参考資料をご覧下さい。私たちのDP-201受験料過去問参考資料は十年以上にわたり、専門家が何度も練習して、作られました。あなたに高品質で、全面的なDP-201受験料過去問参考資料を提供することは私たちの責任です。私たちより、DP-201受験料過去問試験を知る人はいません。

だから、こんなに保障がある復習ソフトはあなたにMicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問試験を心配させていません。我々NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問試験のソフトウェアを使用し、あなたはMicrosoftのDP-201受験料過去問試験に合格することができます。

DP-201 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You are planning a design pattern based on the Lambda architecture as shown in the exhibit.
Which Azure services should you use f2 or the cold path? To answer, drag the appropriate services to the correct layers. Each service may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
Layer 2: Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
Layer 3: Azure SQL Data Warehouse
Azure SQL Data Warehouse can be used for batch processing.
Note: Lambda architectures use batch-processing, stream-processing, and a serving layer to minimize the latency involved in querying big data.
References:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/lambda-architecture-using-azure-cosmosdb-faster- performance-low-tco-l
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch- processing

QUESTION NO: 2
You have a Windows-based solution that analyzes scientific data. You are designing a cloud- based solution that performs real-time analysis of the data.
You need to design the logical flow for the solution.
Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A. Send data from the application to Azure Data Lake Storage.
B. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from an Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Azure Data Lake Storage.
C. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job on an edge device. Ingress data from an Azure Data Factory instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
D. Send data from the application to an Azure Stream Analytics job.
E. Send data from the application to an Azure Event Hub instance.
F. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from the Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
Answer: E,F
Explanation
Stream Analytics has first-class integration with Azure data streams as inputs from three kinds of resources:
Azure Event Hubs
Azure IoT Hub
Azure Blob storage
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/stream-analytics/stream-analytics-define-inputs

QUESTION NO: 3
Which consistency level should you use for Health Interface?
A. Strong
B. Bounded Staleness
C. Session
D. Consistent Prefix
Answer: A
Explanation
Scenario: ADatum identifies the following requirements for the Health Interface application:
reads must display be the most recent committed version of an item.
Azure Cosmos DB consistency levels include:
Strong: Strong consistency offers a linearizability guarantee. Linearizability refers to serving requests concurrently. The reads are guaranteed to return the most recent committed version of an item. A client never sees an uncommitted or partial write. Users are always guaranteed to read the latest committed write.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/consistency-levels

QUESTION NO: 4
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an HDInsight/Hadoop cluster solution that uses Azure Data Lake Gen1 Storage.
The solution requires POSIX permissions and enables diagnostics logging for auditing.
You need to recommend solutions that optimize storage.
Proposed Solution: Implement compaction jobs to combine small files into larger files.
Does the solution meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: A
Explanation
Depending on what services and workloads are using the data, a good size to consider for files is 256
MB or greater. If the file sizes cannot be batched when landing in Data Lake Storage Gen1, you can have a separate compaction job that combines these files into larger ones.
Note: POSIX permissions and auditing in Data Lake Storage Gen1 comes with an overhead that becomes apparent when working with numerous small files. As a best practice, you must batch your data into larger files versus writing thousands or millions of small files to Data Lake Storage Gen1.
Avoiding small file sizes can have multiple benefits, such as:
Lowering the authentication checks across multiple files
Reduced open file connections
Faster copying/replication
Fewer files to process when updating Data Lake Storage Gen1 POSIX permissions References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-lake-store/data-lake-store-best-practices

QUESTION NO: 5
You are designing a solution that will use Azure Table storage. The solution will log records in the following entity.
You are evaluating which partition key to use based on the following two scenarios:
* Scenario1: Minimize hotspots under heavy write workloads.
* Scenario2: Ensure that date lookups are as efficient as possible for read workloads.
Which partition key should you use for each scenario? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/designing-a-scalable-partitioning- strategy-for-azure-tab

EMC D-CI-DS-23 - NewValidDumpsはきみの貴重な時間を節約するだけでなく、 安心で順調に試験に合格するのを保証します。 我々実力が強いITチームの提供するMicrosoftのNetwork Appliance NS0-521ソフトはあなたに満足させることができます。 Microsoft DP-420J - NewValidDumps を選択して100%の合格率を確保することができて、もし試験に失敗したら、NewValidDumpsが全額で返金いたします。 弊社のSAP C-SIGPM-2403問題集はあなたにこのチャンスを全面的に与えられます。 Oracle 1z0-808 - そうしたらあなたはNewValidDumpsが用意した問題集にもっと自信があります。

Updated: May 28, 2022

DP-201受験料過去問 - Microsoft DP-201日本語的中対策 & Designing An Azure Data Solution

PDF問題と解答

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-15
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 トレーニング資料

  ダウンロード


 

模擬試験

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-15
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 テスト内容

  ダウンロード


 

オンライン版

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-05-15
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 最新試験

  ダウンロード


 

DP-201 合格率書籍