DP-201予想試験 資格取得

DP-201予想試験試験は難しいと言えば、解決法があります。解決法はDP-201予想試験問題集は購入することです。DP-201予想試験問題集の的中率が高くて、多くの人はDP-201予想試験試験に合格しました。 NewValidDumpsの試験トレーニング資料はMicrosoftのDP-201予想試験認定試験の100パーセントの合格率を保証します。近年、IT領域で競争がますます激しくなります。 そのデモはDP-201予想試験試験資料の一部を含めています。

Azure Data Engineer Associate DP-201 ここには、私たちは君の需要に応じます。

もし君がMicrosoftのDP-201 - Designing an Azure Data Solution予想試験に参加すれば、良い学習のツルを選ぶすべきです。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201 受験料過去問試験トレーニング資料は試験問題と解答を含まれて、豊富な経験を持っているIT業種の専門家が長年の研究を通じて作成したものです。その権威性は言うまでもありません。

NewValidDumpsは100%の合格率を保証するだけでなく、1年間の無料なオンラインの更新を提供しております。最新の資源と最新の動態が第一時間にお客様に知らせいたします。何の問題があったらお気軽に聞いてください。

Microsoft DP-201予想試験 - 資料の整理に悩んでいますか。

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのDP-201予想試験試験トレーニング資料を手に入れたら、我々は一年間の無料更新サービスを提供します。それはあなたがいつでも最新の試験資料を持てるということです。試験の目標が変わる限り、あるいは我々の勉強資料が変わる限り、すぐに更新して差し上げます。あなたのニーズをよく知っていていますから、あなたに試験に合格する自信を与えます。

我々は弊社のソフトを通してあなたにMicrosoftのDP-201予想試験試験に合格する喜びを感じさせると希望しています。あなたの成功も我々NewValidDumpsの成功です。

DP-201 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You are planning a design pattern based on the Lambda architecture as shown in the exhibit.
Which Azure services should you use f2 or the cold path? To answer, drag the appropriate services to the correct layers. Each service may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
Layer 2: Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2
Layer 3: Azure SQL Data Warehouse
Azure SQL Data Warehouse can be used for batch processing.
Note: Lambda architectures use batch-processing, stream-processing, and a serving layer to minimize the latency involved in querying big data.
References:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/lambda-architecture-using-azure-cosmosdb-faster- performance-low-tco-l
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch- processing

QUESTION NO: 2
You have a Windows-based solution that analyzes scientific data. You are designing a cloud- based solution that performs real-time analysis of the data.
You need to design the logical flow for the solution.
Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
A. Send data from the application to Azure Data Lake Storage.
B. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from an Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Azure Data Lake Storage.
C. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job on an edge device. Ingress data from an Azure Data Factory instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
D. Send data from the application to an Azure Stream Analytics job.
E. Send data from the application to an Azure Event Hub instance.
F. Use an Azure Stream Analytics job in the cloud. Ingress data from the Azure Event Hub instance and build queries that output to Power BI.
Answer: E,F
Explanation
Stream Analytics has first-class integration with Azure data streams as inputs from three kinds of resources:
Azure Event Hubs
Azure IoT Hub
Azure Blob storage
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/stream-analytics/stream-analytics-define-inputs

QUESTION NO: 3
Which consistency level should you use for Health Interface?
A. Strong
B. Bounded Staleness
C. Session
D. Consistent Prefix
Answer: A
Explanation
Scenario: ADatum identifies the following requirements for the Health Interface application:
reads must display be the most recent committed version of an item.
Azure Cosmos DB consistency levels include:
Strong: Strong consistency offers a linearizability guarantee. Linearizability refers to serving requests concurrently. The reads are guaranteed to return the most recent committed version of an item. A client never sees an uncommitted or partial write. Users are always guaranteed to read the latest committed write.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/consistency-levels

QUESTION NO: 4
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an HDInsight/Hadoop cluster solution that uses Azure Data Lake Gen1 Storage.
The solution requires POSIX permissions and enables diagnostics logging for auditing.
You need to recommend solutions that optimize storage.
Proposed Solution: Implement compaction jobs to combine small files into larger files.
Does the solution meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: A
Explanation
Depending on what services and workloads are using the data, a good size to consider for files is 256
MB or greater. If the file sizes cannot be batched when landing in Data Lake Storage Gen1, you can have a separate compaction job that combines these files into larger ones.
Note: POSIX permissions and auditing in Data Lake Storage Gen1 comes with an overhead that becomes apparent when working with numerous small files. As a best practice, you must batch your data into larger files versus writing thousands or millions of small files to Data Lake Storage Gen1.
Avoiding small file sizes can have multiple benefits, such as:
Lowering the authentication checks across multiple files
Reduced open file connections
Faster copying/replication
Fewer files to process when updating Data Lake Storage Gen1 POSIX permissions References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-lake-store/data-lake-store-best-practices

QUESTION NO: 5
You are designing a solution that will use Azure Table storage. The solution will log records in the following entity.
You are evaluating which partition key to use based on the following two scenarios:
* Scenario1: Minimize hotspots under heavy write workloads.
* Scenario2: Ensure that date lookups are as efficient as possible for read workloads.
Which partition key should you use for each scenario? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/designing-a-scalable-partitioning- strategy-for-azure-tab

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのCompTIA 220-1101J試験トレーニング資料は最高のトレーニング資料です。 あなたは安心で我々の商品を購入できるために、我々は各バーションのMicrosoftのHP HP2-I65復習資料のサンプルを提供してあなたに試させます。 IBM C1000-162 - IT技術の急速な発展につれて、IT認証試験の問題は常に変更されています。 その結果、自信になる自己は面接のときに、面接官のいろいろな質問を気軽に回答できて、順調にCompTIA SK0-005J向けの会社に入ります。 NewValidDumpsのPegasystems PEGACPSSA23V1問題集は多くの受験生に検証されたものですから、高い成功率を保証できます。

Updated: May 28, 2022

DP-201予想試験 - DP-201関連合格問題 & Designing An Azure Data Solution

PDF問題と解答

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-04-28
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 資格トレーニング

  ダウンロード


 

模擬試験

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-04-28
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 テスト資料

  ダウンロード


 

オンライン版

試験コード:DP-201
試験名称:Designing an Azure Data Solution
最近更新時間:2024-04-28
問題と解答:全 207
Microsoft DP-201 独学書籍

  ダウンロード


 

DP-201 合格率書籍