ここには、私たちは君の需要に応じます。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得問題集を購入したら、私たちは君のために、一年間無料で更新サービスを提供することができます。もし不合格になったら、私たちは全額返金することを保証します。 この参考書は短い時間で試験に十分に準備させ、そして楽に試験に合格させます。試験のためにあまりの時間と精力を無駄にしたくないなら、NewValidDumpsの70-461日本語資格取得問題集は間違いなくあなたに最もふさわしい選択です。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得試験トレーニング資料は試験問題と解答を含まれて、豊富な経験を持っているIT業種の専門家が長年の研究を通じて作成したものです。

MCSA 70-461 それをもって、試験は問題になりませんよ。

NewValidDumpsの70-461 - Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014日本語資格取得問題集は多くの受験生に検証されたものですから、高い成功率を保証できます。 NewValidDumpsはとても人気がありますから、それを選ばない理由はないです。もちろん、完璧なトレーニング資料を差し上げましたが、もしあなたに向いていないのなら無用になりますから、NewValidDumpsを利用する前に、一部の問題と解答を無料にダウンロードしてみることができます。

NewValidDumpsのITエリートたちは彼らの専門的な目で、最新的なMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得試験トレーニング資料に注目していて、うちのMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得問題集の高い正確性を保証するのです。もし君はいささかな心配することがあるなら、あなたはうちの商品を購入する前に、NewValidDumpsは無料でサンプルを提供することができます。なぜ受験生のほとんどはNewValidDumpsを選んだのですか。

Microsoft 70-461日本語資格取得 - できるだけ100％の通過率を保証使用にしています。

短い時間に最も小さな努力で一番効果的にMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得試験の準備をしたいのなら、NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得試験トレーニング資料を利用することができます。NewValidDumpsのトレーニング資料は実践の検証に合格すたもので、多くの受験生に証明された１００パーセントの成功率を持っている資料です。NewValidDumpsを利用したら、あなたは自分の目標を達成することができ、最良の結果を得ます。

ただ、社会に入るIT卒業生たちは自分能力の不足で、70-461日本語資格取得試験向けの仕事を探すのを悩んでいますか？それでは、弊社のMicrosoftの70-461日本語資格取得練習問題を選んで実用能力を速く高め、自分を充実させます。その結果、自信になる自己は面接のときに、面接官のいろいろな質問を気軽に回答できて、順調に70-461日本語資格取得向けの会社に入ります。

70-461 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You have an XML schema collection named Sales.InvoiceSchema.
You need to declare a variable of the XML type named invoice. The solution must ensure that the invoice is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema.
The solution must ensure that the invoice variable is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema schema.
Provide the correct code in the answer area.
Answer:
DECLARE @invoice XML(Sales.InvoiceSchema)

QUESTION NO: 2
You are the administrator for a heavily-used OLTP Microsoft SQL Server database.
You are troubleshooting performance issues seen when using stored procedures in the database. The database stores millions of orders across thousands of customers. Some of the customers have large numbers of orders, while others have only one order. You update the statistics and perform defragmentation of all tables and indexes, but two stored procedures still have issues when accessing data.
p_GetCustomer accepts @companyID as a parameter. From the results of profiling, you know that 90 percent of the calls use the @companyid value of 5, while the other 10 percent of calls are evenly distributed across another 10000 values. While viewing the execution plan, you discover that a non- clustered index seek is used.
p_GetShipDate accepts @orderID as a parameter and returns the ship date for that order. You discover that the execution plan is performing a scan on a non-clustered index that has orderID as the index key.
You need to add appropriate query hints to each stored procedure to improve the performance.
What should you do? To answer, drag the appropriate procedures to the correct hints. Each procedure may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
Answer:
Explanation:
Box 1: Optimize FOR..
OPTIMIZE FOR ( @variable_name { UNKNOWN | = literal_constant } [ , ...n ] ) Instructs the query optimizer to use a particular value for a local variable when the query is compiled and optimized. The value is used only during query optimization, and not during query execution.
Box 2: FORCESEEK
FORCESEEK [ (index_value(index_column_name [ ,... n ] )) ]
Specifies that the query optimizer use only an index seek operation as the access path to the data in the table or view.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-query?view=sql-server-2017
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-table?view=sql-server-2017

QUESTION NO: 3
You have a database that contains the tables shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to create a view named uv_CustomerFullName to meet the following requirements:
* The code must NOT include object delimiters.
* The view must be created in the Sales schema.
* Columns must only be referenced by using one-part names.
* The view must return the first name and the last name of all customers.
* The view must prevent the underlying structure of the customer table from being changed.
* The view must be able to resolve all referenced objects, regardless of the user's default schema.
Which code segment should you use?
To answer, type the correct code in the answer area.
A. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
B. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM Sales.Customers
Answer: B
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187956.aspx

QUESTION NO: 4
You administer a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database named ContosoDb. Tables are defined as shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to display rows from the Orders table for the Customers row having the CustomerId value set to 1 in the following XML format:
<row OrderId="1" OrderDate="2000-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="3400.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" />
<row OrderId="2" OrderDate="2001-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="4300.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" /> Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW
B. SELECT Name AS 'Customers/Name', Country AS 'Customers/Country', OrderId, OrderDate,
Amount FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId
WHERE Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
C. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId - Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
D. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
E. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
F. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
G. SELECT Name AS '@Name', Country AS '@Country', OrderId, OrderDate, Amount FROM Orders
INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
H. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW, ELEMENTS
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 5
Your database contains a table named Purchases. The table includes a DATETIME column named PurchaseTime that stores the date and time each purchase is made. There is a non-clustered index on the PurchaseTime column.
The business team wants a report that displays the total number of purchases made on the current day.
You need to write a query that will return the correct results in the most efficient manner.
Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = GETDATE()
B. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime >= CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
AND PurchaseTime < DATEADD(DAY, 1, CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE()))
C. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE CONVERT(VARCHAR, PurchaseTime, 112) = CONVERT(VARCHAR, GETDATE(), 112)
D. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
Answer: B
Explanation:
Two answers will return the correct results (the "WHERE CONVERT..." and "WHERE ... AND ... " answers).
The correct answer for Microsoft would be the answer that is most "efficient". Anybody have a clue as to which is most efficient? In the execution plan, the one that I've selected as the correct answer is the query with the shortest duration. Also, the query answer with "WHERE CONVERT..." threw warnings in the execution plan...something about affecting CardinalityEstimate and SeekPlan.
I also found this article, which leads me to believe that I have the correct answer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181034.aspx

ISC CISSP - NewValidDumpsトレーニング資料を選んだら、あなたは自分の夢を実現できます。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoft　ECCouncil 312-85問題集は専門家たちが数年間で過去のデータから分析して作成されて、試験にカバーする範囲は広くて、受験生の皆様のお金と時間を節約します。 ISC CGRC - もしこの試験に関連する知識が非常に不足であると同時にこの試験に合格したい場合、あなたはどうするつもりですか。 Cisco 820-605J - IT職員のあなたは毎月毎月のあまり少ない給料を持っていますが、暇の時間でひたすら楽しむんでいいですか。 NewValidDumpsは最高のCompTIA 220-1101J資料を提供するだけでなく、高品質のサービスも提供します。

Updated: May 28, 2022