NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南の認証したカバー率は１００パーセントに達したのですから、弊社の問題と解答を利用する限り、あなたがきっと気楽に試験に合格することを保証します。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南試験のトレーニングキットはNewValidDumpsのIT技術専門家たちによって開発されたのです。そのデザインは当面の急速に変化するIT市場と密接な関係があります。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南試験トレーニング資料は豊富な経験を持っているIT専門家が研究したものです。君がMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南問題集を購入したら、私たちは一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができます。 これはNewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南試験トレーニング資料は確かに信頼できて、受験生の皆様が首尾よく試験に合格することに助けを差し上げられることが証明されました。

MCSA 70-461 試験に失敗したら、全額で返金する承諾があります。

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461 - Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014日本語版復習指南試験トレーニング資料を利用したら、望むことを取得できます。 我々もオンライン版とソフト版を提供します。すべては豊富な内容があって各自のメリットを持っています。

それはNewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南試験トレーニング資料は適用性が高いもので、本当にみなさんが良い成績を取ることを助けられるからです。NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南試験トレーニング資料の知名度が非常に高いことを皆はよく知っています。NewValidDumps は世界的によく知られているサイトです。

Microsoft 70-461日本語版復習指南認定試験に合格することは難しいようですね。

明日ではなく、今日が大事と良く知られるから、そんなにぐずぐずしないで早く我々社のMicrosoft　70-461日本語版復習指南日本語対策問題集を勉強し、自身を充実させます。我々社の練習問題は長年で70-461日本語版復習指南全真模擬試験トレーニング資料に研究している専業化チームによって編集されます。Microsoft　70-461日本語版復習指南資格問題集はPDF版、ソフト版、オンライン版を含まれ、この三つバージョンから自分の愛用することを選んでいます。他の人に先立ってMicrosoft　70-461日本語版復習指南認定資格を得るために、今から勉強しましょう。

一回だけでMicrosoftの70-461日本語版復習指南試験に合格したい？NewValidDumpsは君の欲求を満たすために存在するのです。NewValidDumpsは君にとってベストな選択になります。

70-461 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You have an XML schema collection named Sales.InvoiceSchema.
You need to declare a variable of the XML type named invoice. The solution must ensure that the invoice is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema.
The solution must ensure that the invoice variable is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema schema.
Provide the correct code in the answer area.
Answer:
DECLARE @invoice XML(Sales.InvoiceSchema)

QUESTION NO: 2
You have a database that contains the tables shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to create a view named uv_CustomerFullName to meet the following requirements:
* The code must NOT include object delimiters.
* The view must be created in the Sales schema.
* Columns must only be referenced by using one-part names.
* The view must return the first name and the last name of all customers.
* The view must prevent the underlying structure of the customer table from being changed.
* The view must be able to resolve all referenced objects, regardless of the user's default schema.
Which code segment should you use?
To answer, type the correct code in the answer area.
A. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
B. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM Sales.Customers
Answer: B
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187956.aspx

QUESTION NO: 3
You are the administrator for a heavily-used OLTP Microsoft SQL Server database.
You are troubleshooting performance issues seen when using stored procedures in the database. The database stores millions of orders across thousands of customers. Some of the customers have large numbers of orders, while others have only one order. You update the statistics and perform defragmentation of all tables and indexes, but two stored procedures still have issues when accessing data.
p_GetCustomer accepts @companyID as a parameter. From the results of profiling, you know that 90 percent of the calls use the @companyid value of 5, while the other 10 percent of calls are evenly distributed across another 10000 values. While viewing the execution plan, you discover that a non- clustered index seek is used.
p_GetShipDate accepts @orderID as a parameter and returns the ship date for that order. You discover that the execution plan is performing a scan on a non-clustered index that has orderID as the index key.
You need to add appropriate query hints to each stored procedure to improve the performance.
What should you do? To answer, drag the appropriate procedures to the correct hints. Each procedure may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
Answer:
Explanation:
Box 1: Optimize FOR..
OPTIMIZE FOR ( @variable_name { UNKNOWN | = literal_constant } [ , ...n ] ) Instructs the query optimizer to use a particular value for a local variable when the query is compiled and optimized. The value is used only during query optimization, and not during query execution.
Box 2: FORCESEEK
FORCESEEK [ (index_value(index_column_name [ ,... n ] )) ]
Specifies that the query optimizer use only an index seek operation as the access path to the data in the table or view.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-query?view=sql-server-2017
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-table?view=sql-server-2017

QUESTION NO: 4
You administer a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database named ContosoDb. Tables are defined as shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to display rows from the Orders table for the Customers row having the CustomerId value set to 1 in the following XML format:
<row OrderId="1" OrderDate="2000-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="3400.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" />
<row OrderId="2" OrderDate="2001-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="4300.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" /> Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW
B. SELECT Name AS 'Customers/Name', Country AS 'Customers/Country', OrderId, OrderDate,
Amount FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId
WHERE Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
C. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId - Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
D. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
E. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
F. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
G. SELECT Name AS '@Name', Country AS '@Country', OrderId, OrderDate, Amount FROM Orders
INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
H. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW, ELEMENTS
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 5
Your database contains a table named Purchases. The table includes a DATETIME column named PurchaseTime that stores the date and time each purchase is made. There is a non-clustered index on the PurchaseTime column.
The business team wants a report that displays the total number of purchases made on the current day.
You need to write a query that will return the correct results in the most efficient manner.
Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = GETDATE()
B. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime >= CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
AND PurchaseTime < DATEADD(DAY, 1, CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE()))
C. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE CONVERT(VARCHAR, PurchaseTime, 112) = CONVERT(VARCHAR, GETDATE(), 112)
D. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
Answer: B
Explanation:
Two answers will return the correct results (the "WHERE CONVERT..." and "WHERE ... AND ... " answers).
The correct answer for Microsoft would be the answer that is most "efficient". Anybody have a clue as to which is most efficient? In the execution plan, the one that I've selected as the correct answer is the query with the shortest duration. Also, the query answer with "WHERE CONVERT..." threw warnings in the execution plan...something about affecting CardinalityEstimate and SeekPlan.
I also found this article, which leads me to believe that I have the correct answer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181034.aspx

PRINCE2 PRINCE2-Foundation-JPN試験参考書はお客様の試験のために最も役に立つ商品だとも言えます。 NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのHP HP2-I63試験トレーニング資料は試験問題と解答を含まれて、豊富な経験を持っているIT業種の専門家が長年の研究を通じて作成したものです。 Salesforce Advanced-Administrator - もし弊社の問題集を勉強してそれは簡単になります。 我々の目的はあなたにMicrosoftのPRINCE2 PRINCE2Foundation試験に合格することだけです。 Salesforce Salesforce-Contact-Center - 弊社の資料を使って、１００％に合格を保証いたします。

Updated: May 28, 2022