NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftの70-461参考資料試験トレーニング資料は正確性が高くて、カバー率が広くて、値段も安いです。君がうちの学習教材を購入した後、私たちは一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができます。もしMicrosoftの70-461参考資料問題集は問題があれば、或いは試験に不合格になる場合は、全額返金することを保証いたします。 NewValidDumpsの70-461参考資料問題集は多くの受験生に検証されたものですから、高い成功率を保証できます。もしこの問題集を利用してからやはり試験に不合格になってしまえば、NewValidDumpsは全額で返金することができます。 すべてのことの目的はあなたに安心に試験に準備さされるということです。

また、70-461参考資料問題集は的中率が高いです。

多分、70-461 - Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012/2014参考資料テスト質問の数が伝統的な問題の数倍である。 簡単で順調にMicrosoft 70-461 無料問題認定試験を通すのは問題になりますが、NewValidDumpsはこの問題を解決できるよ。弊社の問題集はIT技術者がこつこつ研究して、正確で最新なもので君の70-461 無料問題認定試験を簡単に通すことにいいトレーニングツールになりますよ。

Microsoftの70-461参考資料の認定試験に合格すれば、就職機会が多くなります。この試験に合格すれば君の専門知識がとても強いを証明し得ます。Microsoftの70-461参考資料の認定試験は君の実力を考察するテストでございます。

Microsoft 70-461参考資料 - それは受験者にとって重要な情報です。

我々は受験生の皆様により高いスピードを持っているかつ効率的なサービスを提供することにずっと力を尽くしていますから、あなたが貴重な時間を節約することに助けを差し上げます。NewValidDumps Microsoftの70-461参考資料試験問題集はあなたに問題と解答に含まれている大量なテストガイドを提供しています。インターネットで時勢に遅れない70-461参考資料勉強資料を提供するというサイトがあるかもしれませんが、NewValidDumpsはあなたに高品質かつ最新のMicrosoftの70-461参考資料トレーニング資料を提供するユニークなサイトです。NewValidDumpsの勉強資料とMicrosoftの70-461参考資料に関する指導を従えば、初めてMicrosoftの70-461参考資料認定試験を受けるあなたでも一回で試験に合格することができます。

弊社の無料なサンプルを遠慮なくダウンロードしてください。君はまだMicrosoftの70-461参考資料認証試験を通じての大きい難度が悩んでいますか？ 君はまだMicrosoft 70-461参考資料認証試験に合格するために寝食を忘れて頑張って復習しますか？ 早くてMicrosoft 70-461参考資料認証試験を通りたいですか？NewValidDumpsを選択しましょう！

70-461 PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
You have an XML schema collection named Sales.InvoiceSchema.
You need to declare a variable of the XML type named invoice. The solution must ensure that the invoice is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema.
The solution must ensure that the invoice variable is validated by using Sales.InvoiceSchema schema.
Provide the correct code in the answer area.
Answer:
DECLARE @invoice XML(Sales.InvoiceSchema)

QUESTION NO: 2
You are the administrator for a heavily-used OLTP Microsoft SQL Server database.
You are troubleshooting performance issues seen when using stored procedures in the database. The database stores millions of orders across thousands of customers. Some of the customers have large numbers of orders, while others have only one order. You update the statistics and perform defragmentation of all tables and indexes, but two stored procedures still have issues when accessing data.
p_GetCustomer accepts @companyID as a parameter. From the results of profiling, you know that 90 percent of the calls use the @companyid value of 5, while the other 10 percent of calls are evenly distributed across another 10000 values. While viewing the execution plan, you discover that a non- clustered index seek is used.
p_GetShipDate accepts @orderID as a parameter and returns the ship date for that order. You discover that the execution plan is performing a scan on a non-clustered index that has orderID as the index key.
You need to add appropriate query hints to each stored procedure to improve the performance.
What should you do? To answer, drag the appropriate procedures to the correct hints. Each procedure may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
Answer:
Explanation:
Box 1: Optimize FOR..
OPTIMIZE FOR ( @variable_name { UNKNOWN | = literal_constant } [ , ...n ] ) Instructs the query optimizer to use a particular value for a local variable when the query is compiled and optimized. The value is used only during query optimization, and not during query execution.
Box 2: FORCESEEK
FORCESEEK [ (index_value(index_column_name [ ,... n ] )) ]
Specifies that the query optimizer use only an index seek operation as the access path to the data in the table or view.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-query?view=sql-server-2017
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/queries/hints-transact-sql-table?view=sql-server-2017

QUESTION NO: 3
You have a database that contains the tables shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to create a view named uv_CustomerFullName to meet the following requirements:
* The code must NOT include object delimiters.
* The view must be created in the Sales schema.
* Columns must only be referenced by using one-part names.
* The view must return the first name and the last name of all customers.
* The view must prevent the underlying structure of the customer table from being changed.
* The view must be able to resolve all referenced objects, regardless of the user's default schema.
Which code segment should you use?
To answer, type the correct code in the answer area.
A. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
B. CREATE VIEW Sales.uv_CustomerFullName
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM Sales.Customers
Answer: B
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187956.aspx

QUESTION NO: 4
You administer a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database named ContosoDb. Tables are defined as shown in the exhibit. (Click the Exhibit button.)
You need to display rows from the Orders table for the Customers row having the CustomerId value set to 1 in the following XML format:
<row OrderId="1" OrderDate="2000-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="3400.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" />
<row OrderId="2" OrderDate="2001-01-01T00:00:00" Amount="4300.00" Name="Customer A"
Country="Australia" /> Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW
B. SELECT Name AS 'Customers/Name', Country AS 'Customers/Country', OrderId, OrderDate,
Amount FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId
WHERE Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
C. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId - Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
D. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
E. SELECT Name, Country, OrderId, OrderDate, Amount
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
F. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML AUTO
G. SELECT Name AS '@Name', Country AS '@Country', OrderId, OrderDate, Amount FROM Orders
INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId= Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML PATH ('Customers')
H. SELECT OrderId, OrderDate, Amount, Name, Country
FROM Orders INNER JOIN Customers ON Orders.CustomerId = Customers.CustomerId WHERE
Customers.CustomerId = 1 FOR XML RAW, ELEMENTS
Answer: A

QUESTION NO: 5
Your database contains a table named Purchases. The table includes a DATETIME column named PurchaseTime that stores the date and time each purchase is made. There is a non-clustered index on the PurchaseTime column.
The business team wants a report that displays the total number of purchases made on the current day.
You need to write a query that will return the correct results in the most efficient manner.
Which Transact-SQL query should you use?
A. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = GETDATE()
B. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime >= CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
AND PurchaseTime < DATEADD(DAY, 1, CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE()))
C. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE CONVERT(VARCHAR, PurchaseTime, 112) = CONVERT(VARCHAR, GETDATE(), 112)
D. SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Purchases
WHERE PurchaseTime = CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE())
Answer: B
Explanation:
Two answers will return the correct results (the "WHERE CONVERT..." and "WHERE ... AND ... " answers).
The correct answer for Microsoft would be the answer that is most "efficient". Anybody have a clue as to which is most efficient? In the execution plan, the one that I've selected as the correct answer is the query with the shortest duration. Also, the query answer with "WHERE CONVERT..." threw warnings in the execution plan...something about affecting CardinalityEstimate and SeekPlan.
I also found this article, which leads me to believe that I have the correct answer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181034.aspx

NewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのEMC D-PWF-DS-23トレーニング資料即ち問題と解答をダウンロードする限り、気楽に試験に受かることができるようになります。 NewValidDumpsを利用したら、MicrosoftのSalesforce Heroku-Architect試験に合格するのを心配することはないです。 Salesforce Salesforce-AI-Associate - NewValidDumpsはあなたが首尾よく試験に合格することを助けるだけでなく、あなたの知識と技能を向上させることもできます。 CWNP CWNA-109 - NewValidDumpsはそれを通じていつまでも最高の品質を持っています。 試験の準備をするためにNewValidDumpsのMicrosoftのHP HP2-I65試験トレーニング資料を買うのは冒険的行為と思ったとしたら、あなたの人生の全てが冒険なことになります。

Updated: May 28, 2022