IT認定試験は様々あります。どの試験を受験したことがありますか。たとえばPDPF合格体験記認定試験などです。 EXINのPDPF合格体験記認定試験は実は技術専門家を認証する試験です。EXINのPDPF合格体験記認定試験はIT人員が優れたキャリアを持つことを助けられます。 非常に人気があるEXINの認定試験の一つとして、この試験も大切です。

Exin Privacy & Data Protection PDPF それはあなたが夢を実現することを助けられます。

NewValidDumpsはEXINのPDPF - EXIN Privacy and Data Protection Foundation合格体験記問題集の正確性と高いカバー率を保証します。 最近、EXINのPDPF 受験記対策試験は非常に人気のある認定試験です。あなたもこの試験の認定資格を取得したいのですか。

NewValidDumpsを選ぶなら、私たちは君の認定試験に合格するのを保証します。ITエリートになるという夢は現実の世界で叶えやすくありません。しかし、EXINのPDPF合格体験記認定試験に合格するという夢は、NewValidDumpsに対して、絶対に掴められます。

EXIN PDPF合格体験記 - 躊躇わなく、行動しましょう。

数年以来の整理と分析によって開発されたPDPF合格体験記問題集は権威的で全面的です。PDPF合格体験記問題集を利用して試験に合格できます。この問題集の合格率は高いので、多くのお客様からPDPF合格体験記問題集への好評をもらいました。PDPF合格体験記問題集のカーバー率が高いので、勉強した問題は試験に出ることが多いです。だから、弊社の提供するPDPF合格体験記問題集を暗記すれば、きっと試験に合格できます。

PDPF合格体験記資格証明書があれば、履歴書は他の人の履歴書より目立つようになります。現在、PDPF合格体験記資格証明書の知名度がますます高くなっています。

PDPF PDF DEMO:

QUESTION NO: 1
Which of the options below is classified as a personal data breach under the GDPR?
A. Strategic company data is mistakenly shared.
B. Personal data processed without the consent of the controller.
C. A server is attacked and exploited by a hacker.
D. Data accessed by employees without permission.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Another option says: "A server is attacked and exploited by a hacker", however, here it does not provide information if that server contained personal data.
The other wrong option is: "Strategic company data is mistakenly shared". Strategic data is not personal data.
For these reasons, the correct option is "Personal data processed without the consent of the controller". Note: even if the processor has a contract that authorizes the processing of personal data on behalf of the controller, it cannot perform any treatment to which it was not previously authorized, nor can it sub-process without the knowledge and consent of the controller.

QUESTION NO: 2
According to the GDPR, in what situation must data subjects always be notified of a personal data breach?
A. When there is a significant probability that the breach will lead to a high risk for the privacy of the data subjects
B. When the system on which the personal data is processed is attacked causing damage to its storage devices
C. When personal data is processed by a party that agreed to the draft processing contract but has not yet signed it
D. When personal data is processed at a facility of the processor that is not located within the borders of the EEA
Answer: A
Explanation:
When personal data is processed at a facility of the processor that is not located within the borders of the EEA. Incorrect. The location where the data is processed is of no significance to the obligation to notify data subjects of personal data breaches.
When personal data is processed by a party that agreed to the draft processing contract but has not yet sign it. Incorrect. Personal data processed by another party than the controller without a valid written contract is considered a personal data breach. In the given situation however, negative consequences for the data subjects are unlikely. Notifying the data subject is not obligatory in that case.
When the system on which the personal data is processed is attacked causing damage to its storage devices. Incorrect. Damage to storage devices will make access to the data difficult or even impossible but does not imply illegal processing.
When there is a significant probability that the breach will lead to a high risk for the privacy of the data subjects. Correct. If there is a significant probability of negative impact on the data subjects, the controller is obliged to notify them of the breach. (Literature: A, Chapter 5)

QUESTION NO: 3
We know that when a personal data breach occurs, the data controller (Controller) must notify the Supervisory Authority within 72 hours, without justified delay. However, should the
Controller do if it is unable to communicate within this time?
A. Do not notify and seek ways to hide the violation so that the Supervisory Authority or the titleholders are made aware
B. Send the notification, even after 72 hours, accompanied by the reasons for the delay
Section: (none) Explanation
C. Send the notification with the date of the violation changed, to remain within 72 hours.
D. After 72 hours there is no longer any need to send notification of personal data breach.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Article 33 which deals with "Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority" in its paragraph 1 legislates:
1. In the case of a personal data breach, the controller shall without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, notify the personal data breach to the supervisory authority competent in accordance with Article 55, unless the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Where the notification to the supervisory authority is not made within 72 hours, it shall be accompanied by reasons for the delay.

QUESTION NO: 4
When is a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) under the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) mandatory?
A. Application of new technologies that may imply a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects.
B. There is no security policy and information security risk analysis.
C. In all types of personal data processing.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Whenever a new technology is applied, a DPIA must be performed. In addition, a DPIA must be performed before starting the processing of personal data. This is important to check for risks to data subjects since data collection.
In its Article 35 the GDPR legislates on the Impact assessment on data protection.
1. Where a type of processing in particular using new technologies, and taking into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing, is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller shall, prior to the processing, carry out an assessment of the impact of the envisaged processing operations on the protection of personal data. A single assessment may address a set of similar processing operations that present similar high risks.

QUESTION NO: 5
What year did the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) come into force?
A. 2017
B. 2016
C. 2018
D. 2019
Answer: C
Explanation:
The deadline for companies to adapt and comply with GDPR was May 25, 2018. This is an important date and should be memorized. It is common to have this question in this exam.
Article 99 of GDPR
1. This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
2. It shall apply from 25 May 2018.

CheckPoint 156-315.81 - NewValidDumpsは同業の中でそんなに良い地位を取るの原因は弊社のかなり正確な試験の練習問題と解答そえに迅速の更新で、このようにとても良い成績がとられています。 CompTIA CV0-004J - こうして、君は安心で試験の準備を行ってください。 EXINのHuawei H21-911_V1.0試験に合格することは容易なことではなくて、良い訓練ツールは成功の保証でNewValidDumpsは君の試験の問題を準備してしまいました。 Huawei H40-121 - 専門的な知識が必要で、もしあなたはまだこの方面の知識を欠かれば、NewValidDumpsは君に向ける知識を提供いたします。 ITの専門者はEXINのCisco 500-442認定試験があなたの願望を助けって実現できるのがよく分かります。

Updated: May 27, 2022